Journal of the American College of Certified Wound Specialists
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 51-57, April 2009

Bidirectional Barbed Sutures for Wound Closure: Evolution and Applications

  • Malcolm D. Paul, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery Institute, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Abstract 

Traditionally, wound closure sutures have in common the need to tie knots with the inherent risk of extrusion, palpability, microinfarcts, breakage, and slippage. Bidirectional barbed sutures have barbs arrayed in a helical fashion in opposing directions on either side of an unbarbed midsegment. This suture is inserted at the midpoint of a wound and pulled through till resistance is encountered from the opposing barbs; each half of the suture is then advanced to the lateral ends of the wound. This design provides a method of evenly distributing tension along the incision line, a faster suture placement and closure time with no need to tie knots, and the possibility of improved cosmesis. Bidirectional barbed sutures, which are available in both absorbable and nonabsorbable forms, can be used for simple closures, multilayered closures, and closure of high-tension wounds in a variety of surgical settings.

Keywords: Bidirectional barbed sutures, Wound closure

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest and financial disclosure statement: The author is a paid consultant to Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the manufacturer of Quill SRS, and receives a monthly stipend.

PII: S1876-4983(09)00050-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcws.2009.01.002

Journal of the American College of Certified Wound Specialists
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 51-57, April 2009